Ah, the poor paranoid things. Only the biggest media organisation in Ireland is being picked on and discriminated against.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/ireland/inm-chiefs-in-showdown-at-montrose-6mkhqrj9f
Sunday, 12 March 2017
Rise Like A Phoenix From The Ashes
For any of you who missed it (which I suspect is quite a lot), here's the tiny piece in The Phoenix which The Sunday Independent got all hot and bothered about, and which cost me my book reviewing gig of 18 years standing there. What a paranoid organisation.
THE
PHOENIX FEBRUARY 10, 2017
IRISH
TIMES literary correspondent
Eileen
Battersby would not have been
displeased
at her newspaper’s review last
autumn
of her first novel, Teethmarks
on
My Tongue, penned by Katherine
A
Powers – “remarkably accomplished
work
… excellence … dark wit” and so
on.
She will also be pleased the Sunday
Independent
has chosen, so far, not to
publish
a review commissioned over three
months
ago.
The
review by Desmond Traynor, an
occasional
reviewer at the Sindo, is less
complimentary
than Powers’s critique and
describes
the heroine, Helen’s chronicle
as
“self-involved and repetitious to the
point
that it resembles listening to someone
running
off at the mouth with a bad case
of
logorrhea”. There are other, more
withering
comments in Traynor’s review
but
mercifully the Sindo has failed to
publish
it.
Sindo
literary editor Madeleine Keane
declined
to comment when Goldhawk
innocently
inquired why the review had
not
yet been published. But it seems editor
Cormac
Bourke decided not to. There
was
a time when the Sindo would jump
at
the chance to dish it to those IT snobs.
Is
Bourke’s reticence part of the Sindo’s
new
and less provocative approach to rival
media?
Friday, 17 February 2017
8 From The '80s
In response to
being nominated by Seamus Duggan for the ‘8 from the 80s’ thread that was going
around Facebook, I wrote these entries, one by one. Here they are, all together.
Eight songs from the ’80s that mean the most to you, kind of thing.
#1: ‘Apology Accepted’ by The Go-Betweens. It would be very easy for all
eight songs from the 80s to be Go-Betweens’ songs, but I’m going to nominate
one song from each artist, to keep it representative. So let’s head straight
for their best album, which is Liberty Belle and the Black Diamond
Express. This record contains at
least three stone classics from the group, in ‘Headful of Steam’, ‘The Wrong
Road’ and the track finally chosen, all of them vying equally, and equally
worthy of, top place. ‘Headful’ is the manic, sunny yet somewhat sinister pop
side of the band (contributed by Robert Forster, although he is usually thought
of as the Lennon of the songwriting partnership, to Grant MacLennon’s McCartney
– further evidence of how seamlessly they meet and how hard it can be to tell
them apart when they are working together), while ‘Wrong Road’ and ‘Apology’
are MacLennon ballads. ‘Wrong Road’ has a lot of lyrical/poetic complexity
going for it, but in the end I plumped for the latter because of its greater
emotional heft. (Also, it’s relatively easy to play on the guitar.) Naivety and awkwardness in the face of more worldly-wise, experienced
women is a theme shared by ‘Headful’ and ‘Apology’, but given a more yearning
and wistful, less playful and teasing-the-teaser, treatment here. ‘Headful’’s
infatuation is camuflaged, ‘Apology’’s is naked. I’ve no idea what was going on
in these guys’ private lives at the time. Nor do I care. Just bathe in it, and
enjoy.
#2 ‘Stolen Property’ by The
Triffids. We stay Down Under, for a song by The Go-Betweens
fellow-countrypeople, The Triffids. Born Sandy Devotional is, again, the
group’s best album. Before this, they verred towards ragged punk, after this
they became a tad over-elaborate and over-produced. While there are before and
after songs I dearly love (‘Jesus Calling’, ‘My Baby Thinks She’s A Train’;
‘Bury Me Deep In Love’), this record is the sweet spot where the balance is
exactly right. (I, to my shame, seem to be an inveterate albums guy, even when
talking about individual songs.) As it’s a case of ‘All killer, no filler’, any
number of tracks from this album could have stood in in a representative
capacity: ‘The Seabirds’; ‘Estuary Bed’; ‘Lonely Stretch’, ‘Wide Open Road’;
‘Tender Is The Night (The Long Fedelity)’. I finally settled on ‘Stolen
Property’ because it is the most epic track on the collection, the centerpiece
that everything has been building towards (with the delightful coda of
‘Tender’). ‘You are not freeing any people from prison/You’ve got an aphorism
for every occasion’. Perth, where this band were from, is reputedly the most
remote major city on earth. David McComb (RIP) knew about being physically
surrounded by endless desert. But he knew about the deserts of the heart, too.
#3 ‘No Sex’ by Alex Chilton.
Having created something as near to perfection as you can ever get on this
earth with his bandmates in Big Star, Alex Chilton spent the late 70s and 80s
being degenerate and decadent, displaying his eclectic genre-hopping across a
run of albums, EPs and singles. When ‘No Sex’ sprung out of the speakers in the
mid-80s, it was a blast of pure punk – lyrically if not altogether musically (I
seem to remember hearing a much heavier live version somewhere, but I can’t
locate it at the moment) – a call back to an attitude which seemed to be dying,
or going underground. ‘Can’t get it on/Or even get high/Come on baby/Fuck me
and die’. It expressed perfectly mid-80s nihilsim and angst in the face of the
burgeoning AIDS epidemic, which everyone really did think was going to be an
apocalypse back then – before the medics got to work on the problem. Conspiracy
theories, mass hysteria, judgements from God: oh what times! (‘Hey Little
Child’, by the way, was released in 1979, thus excluding it from this list.) William
Alexander Chilton: agent provocateur; consumate musician.
#4 ‘America Without Tears’ by
Declan McManus. Again, any number of Elvis Costello songs from the 80s would
have an equal claim, and any number of songs from this album, King of
America. Co-produced with T-Bone Burnett (they’d been buddies for a long
time, doubling as country act Hank & Howard Coward), it remains perhaps his
finest hour. This number is tale of G.I.s finding English brides during WWII,
and bringing them home. I remember the wonderfully evocative blank and white
original video, with footage of couples waltzing in dancehalls, but I can’t
locate it just now on the t-idirlíon.
#5 ‘This Must Be The Place (Naïve
Melody)’ by Talking Heads. Frequently criticised at the time as overly
cerebral, this verdict ignored David Byrne’s and the band’s incorporating
elements of funk and gospel , which actually began quite early (e.g. their cover
of ‘Take Me To The River’). This is the band at its most yearning. By David
Byrne’s admission, lyrically it is the only straight love song he had written
up to that point. It’s a naive melody because the guitar and bass both play the
same parts. It remains untarnished despite having its title coopted for Paolo
Sorrentino’s interminable film. When my friend and former student Janey Lewis
died, this was one of the songs she selected to be played at the service at her
funeral (along with ‘Raised On Robbery’ by Joni Mitchell, and ‘I Predict A
Riot’ by The Kaiser Chiefs). Probably not even the band's best song, and Fear Of Music is their strongest album,
yet relatively atypical though it is, it sure has the resonance of all their
best work.
#6 ‘Straight To Hell’ by The
Clash. Given recent events in the ‘druggy-drag ragtime USA’, this song about
immigration seems just as releveant as it was when released back in 1982. However,
Joe Strummer does not limit himself to the plight of those Vietmanese kids -
abandoned by their G.I. fathers - with the ‘Amerasian Blues’, but references
hostility to immigrants in the north of England after steel mills have closed
down (hey, that’s going on now too, ‘blame those Poles down the road, not the
bankers’ for the recession), Latinos in Nueva York, and broadens his trademark
collage canvas in the final verse to include everyone everywhere: ‘It could be
anywhere/Most likely could be any frontier/Any hemisphere/No man's land and
there ain't no asylum here/King Solomon he never lived round here.’ Donald
Trump certainly ain’t no King Solomon. But, as always, the lyrics are only half
the story, and Mick Jones supplies a very tasty, hypnotic two chord guitar and
keyboard reverb figure, nailed with a throbbing bassline and fluid ‘bossa nova’
drumming from rhythm section Paul Simenon and Topper Heddon. I, of course,
prefer the longer version producedby Mick Jones, which later appeared on the
bootleg Rat Patrol From Fort Bragg,
rather than the one on official release Combat
Rock which - under record company pressure - had been doctored by Glynn
Johns to produce a shorter album. The thing about The Clash was, in their short
career they kept churning out great stuff right up until the end (I mean until
Mick Jones left). They kind of knew they’d painted (one of) their masterpieces
when they’d finished laying down this track, as remembered by Saint Joe:
‘I'd written the lyric staying up all night at the
Iroquois Hotel. I went down to Electric Lady and I just put the vocal down on
tape, we finished about twenty to midnight. We took the E train from the
Village up to Times Square. I'll never forget coming out of the subway exit,
just before midnight, into a hundred billion people, and I knew we had just
done something really great.’
— Joe
Strummer, Clash on Broadway box set
booklet.
#7 ‘How Soon Is Now?’ by The
Smiths. I was at a bedsit party in my student days when this song came on, and
a fellow scholar instantly opined: “Probably their worst song”. I stared at him
with what I believe, in retrospect, could well be termed ‘blank incredulity’.
(I do hope there wasn’t a hint of scorn in there too.) But he was on to
something, for although it is ‘probably their best song’ (© Des Traynor), it is
also atypical. To crib shamelessly from Wikipedia: ‘In contrast to the frequent
chord changes he had employed in most Smiths' songs, Marr wanted to explore
building a song around a single chord (in this case, F♯).’ It is, of course, the heavy tremolo
effect throughout which is most memorable about the song. I had always presumed,
before I did my research, that this had been achieved by playing through the
vibrato * function on a Vox AC30 (despite having roadtested various amps, still
the only amps I have ever owned – aside from practice and acoustic amps). Turns
out it was a good deal more complicated than that, and involved the use of four
Fender Twin Reverbs and a lot of tape speed manipulation. Then there’s that equally memorable, intermittent, slicing slide figure,
with a touch of delay. The whole thing was a bugger to play live,
apparently. Oh yes, the lyrics I hear you ask. While I hold no brief for Morris
(whose chief problem is that he is in the music business and isn’t a musician,
and so therefore must keep resorting publicity-seeking posturing to stoke the
fires of interest), and regard his solo career as largely self-parody, this is
perhaps the moment where his miserablist minimalist mode reached its zenith,
nay, its apogee. The scene painted over the bridge is particularly brave and
affecting. ‘I’m not in with the in crowd.’ But finally, this track demonstrates
in microcosm what all their work affirms, which is that despite the fact that
Johnny Marr has had the more interesting and fruitful solo career, together
they were more than the sum of the parts.
* Tremolo and vibrato are often confused, and the terms are used
interchangeably among even the most knowledgeable and tech-savvy musicians. For
the record, tremolo is modulation achieved by variations in volume, while with vibrato
it is achieved by variations in pitch. But it’s not surprising that most people
– even musicians – are unconsciously flummoxed, since the tremolo arm on
guitars is really a vibrato arm, and the vibrato function on an AC30 is really
a tremolo effect.
#8 ‘Thoughtless Kind’ by John
Cale. And so we come to the last of my ‘8 from the ’80s’, and naturally there
is a queue around the corner for the last available place. I’ve always had a
deep fondness for ‘Long Time Man’ off of Your
Funeral, My Trial by Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds, but it’s a Tim Rose
cover, which sort of invalidates it. ‘Hairshirt’ is probably my favourite REM
song (along with ‘Cuyahoga’) , (‘There were three great bands in the ’80s, REM,
The Smiths and us. I just think that will become more and more obvious over
time.’ – Robert Forster.), but there’s only room for one more. From the at
times harrowing maserpiece that is Music
For A New Society, this is Cale looking back on madness and fractured or
broken relationships and friendships. You know who you are. It is remarkable
for its equanimity and lack of bitterness. It embodies sad hope in the face of
destructive, hardwon experience. I don’t much care for the updated M:FANS version, but then Cale always did
like taking a sledgehammer to some of his back catelogue. But what happens when
you take a sledgehammer to what’s already been sledgehammered? Let’s not be so
unkind, but rather call them ‘creative’ reinterpretations. Actually, my
favourite version is the live acoustic guitar one from Fragments Of A Rainy Season. But here’s the original, in all its
twisted wonder.
“Absent friends”, I say, raising
a glass.
Teethmarks On My Tongue by Eileen Battersby
Teethmarks On My Tongue
By Eileen Battersby
(Dalkey Archive Press, €16.99 p/b)
When a longstanding book reviewer publishes a debut novel, it can certainly
be seen as an instance of, to quote the popular idiom, ‘putting your money
where your mouth is’. Of course, it is hardly a prerequisite of a good critic
that they should also be good at doing whatever it is they are criticising
(although, that said, most of the best literary critics tend also to be
practicing creative writers): horses for courses, etc. Nevertheless, the
production of an embarrassingly clunky tome can seriously call into question
the writer’s credentials to be passing judgement on the work of others.
Unfortunately, Eileen Battersby’s first foray into fiction does just that, and
can only harm her reputation in her other, chosen field.
Set mostly in Virginia in the
1980’s, the story attempts the classic bildungsroman form, told entirely in the
first person by Helen Stockton Defoe, a horsey girl whose other passions are
astrophysics and painting (specifically that of Caspar David Friedrich). The
daughter of a flibbertigibbet, faux-Southern Belle mother, who is unhelpfully
gunned down in a Richmond street by a crazed lover, and a remote, detached,
world-renowned veterinarian father, Helen is starved of affection and
emotionally stunted. When her father undermines her identity and
self-confidence by selling the horse she was using, and declaring that she is
more of a historian of science rather than an actual scientist, she takes off
on an odyssey of self-discovery, first to France and then Germany.
Alas, this narrative breaks several
of the basic rules of Creative Writing 101, and not in a good way. It doesn’t
show, it tells, so that there is a paucity of tangible scenes furthering plot
and revealing character. Everything takes place in Helen’s head, with the
result that other people, even her best friend Mitzi, are alarmingly
insubstantial and unrealised. Indeed, animals fare better than humans in this
regard, as demonstrated by the affection Helen pours out on Hector, the stray
dog she adopts in Paris. Furthermore, it tells us what we already know, to the
point of insulting the reader’s intelligence. Try these snippets for size:
‘Paris is a big city’; or ‘Turner, the famous English painter’. Plus, we all
know that Eileen Battersby is a Paul Simon fan (hell, so am I, considering him
to be a songwriting genius), but does Helen have to drag his lyrics in at every
turn? It is also in the public domain that EB loves horses, and dogs. Autobiographical,
some? It is, finally, difficult to work up much sympathy for a heroine who thinks
so hierarchically as to opine, on being invited to a jazz club in Paris, that:
‘It wasn’t Bach yet it was an improvement on ABBA.’
In ‘63 Words’, from The Art of The Novel, Milan Kundera
defines Irony thus: ‘Irony. Which is
right and which is wrong? Is Emma Bovary intolerable? Or brave and touching?
And what about Werther? Is he sensitive and noble? Or an aggressive sentimentalist,
infatuated with himself? The more attentively we read a novel, the more impossible
the answer, because the novel is, by definition, the ironic art: its
"truth" is concealed, undeclared, undeclarable.’ Sadly, the truth
here is glaringly self-evident, due to the patent lack of irony. Although not
entirely bereft of self-knowledge, e.g. ‘Lord knows I am stiff and stuffy’,
Helen’s chronicle is self-involved and repetitious, to the point that it
resembles listening to someone running off at the mouth with a bad case of
logorrhea.
When it transpires in the final
pages that Helen has been pregnant for many months of her travels, giving birth
to a baby girl conceived with her French lover Mathieu, it comes as much as a
surprise to the reader as it does to Helen herself, as there had been no
description of their physical relationship. Did she not notice that she had
stopped menstruating? Or had a bit of a bump? Or was Battersby just too lazy to
go back and fix up the text? In any case, there is a dearth of, and curiously
Puritanical reticence about, physicality in general throughout the whole novel,
unless it involves horses, dogs, or vomiting.
Dalkey Archive is a venerable and
prestigious imprint, whose boutique roster includes such eminent names as our
own Flann O’Brien and Aidan Higgins, and international stars of the calibre of
John Barth, Donald Barthelme, Louis-Ferdinand Céline, Robert Coover, William
Gaddis, Janice Galloway, William Gass, Henry Green, Hugh Kenner, Manuel Puig,
Raymond Queneau, Alain Robbe-Grillet and Nathalie Sarraute. So it is difficult
to account for the drop in quality control standards in taking on this amateurish
effort.
Maybe Battersby should stick to what
she knows best: book reviewing. When it comes to fiction writing, she definitely
needs an editor.
This was not published in The Sunday Independent.
Fairly floored me as well.
Tuesday, 4 October 2016
All We Shall Know by Donal Ryan
All We Shall Know
By Donal Ryan
(Transworld, €16.99 p/b)
In his new novel, Donal Ryan attempts to do something male writers essay at
their peril: to write from the first person point of view in a female voice. Of
course, there have been notable achievements among men pretending to be women, perhaps
most famously James Joyce in petticoats as Molly Bloom. Not that the praise for
JJ’s attempt has always been universal: ‘ “Yes” is what men always want women
to say,’ being a favourite line of attack among feminist literary critics,
highlighting the propensity for male wish-fulfillment. Then, in an instance of
being shot by both sides, there is also the risk of being accused by the lads
of merely wanting to score male-feminist brownie points with the ladies. All
this preamble by way of suggesting that the success or failure of Ryan’s
venture depends largely on how well you think he inhabits the mind and body of
his anti-heroine, a diarist with the unlikely name of Melody Shee.
Melody is in a bit of a pickle,
suicidally so. She tells us, by way of introduction: ‘Martin Toppy is the son
of a famous Traveller and the father of my unborn child. He’s seventeen, I’m
thirty-three. I was his teacher. I’d have killed myself by now if I was brave
enough.’ She’s married, and husband Pat doesn’t take the news too well, even if
she strives to ameliorate it by telling him the father is someone she met on
the internet who she had an affair with. She’s had several miscarriages, and
Pat has had a vasectomy to save her any more trouble. He moves back to his
parents’.
Like Anna Karenina, like Emma
Bovary, Melody is a malcontent, and chaffs under the constraints of quotidian
marriage. Pat’s an ordinary guy, a hurler, an electrician, the only boy she
ever kissed (until Martin Toppy). (On a pedantically realist note, Pat is
described as wearing a Liverpool jersey at one point, and a Chelsea shirt a
hundred pages later, which doesn’t do him any favours: as every bloke knows,
you never change your team.) She’s an educated girl, she did English and
History at Limerick University. They are trapped in the endless cycle of an
abusive, destructive relationship.
Ryan takes a further risk by making
his protagonist a not very nice person. This trait is made most manifest in how
she treated her school friend Breedie Flynn, whom she initially befriended but
then betrayed, because she had to get in with the cool girls in school in order
to get to Pat, and Breedie wasn’t cool. It also seems a tad capricious, if not
downright hypocritical, that she is put out on discovering that Pat has been
going to prostitutes, when she hasn’t – as American parlance would have it – been
‘putting out’ for him herself.
Ryan’s account of Melody’s attempt
to establish herself in a journalistic career illustrates how Melody’s variety
of feminism does not sit well with the more herd-like elements of the
sisterhood: ‘I wrote a searing article on inverted sexism as a trope in
advertising. It was published in a broadsheet supplement, and when I looked at
the online edition there was a stream of comments beneath it and my stomach
burnt with the excitement of it all and I waded into them and saw myself being
attacked and I mounted a defence of my position and I gloried in my new-found
notoriety and I railed against this narrow, straitened, un-nuanced, reactionary
brand of feminism, and declared myself to be a proponent of the purest from of
equality, and I was so happy with myself, and I was never asked to write for
that paper again.’ She is nothing if not single-minded and independent.
It’s as well that she is befriended
by Mary Crothery, a young Traveller woman who has been ostracised by her own
family, having been returned by her erstwhile husband’s family for the awful
crime of being barren. This bond makes possible Melody’s final, moving act of
redemption.
Aside from the sexual politics
involved, how well you take to this book will also hinge on how accurately you
think Ryan handles the representation of the vicious and violent tribalism of
Traveller mores.
Believable female character or
flimsy male construct? Honest portrayal of the harshness of Traveller life, or
typical stereotyping of an already marginalised community? Your judgment of the
verisimilitude, or even the fact that you are judging in terms of
verisimilitude will, I suspect, depend on what area of the ideological spectrum
you inhabit. Or, perhaps more fundamentally, on whether or not you are a woman,
and on whether or not you are a Traveller.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

