Sunday, 20 October 2013

Bleeding Edge by Thomas Pynchon


Bleeding Edge

By Thomas Pynchon
(Jonathan Cape, £20.00 stg, H/B)
America’s laureate of the 1960s (and pretty much everything else before and since), Tom Pynchon’s new novel is set in New York, just after Silicon Alley’s (the East Coast’s grubby cousin of the West Coast’s Silicon Valley) dot-com boom went bust, and moves on to encompass the events of September 11, 2001. In Pynchon’s world, naturally, these historical phenomena are not unrelated.
  Our heroine Maxine Tarnow, who bears comparison with The Crying Of Lot 49’s Oedipa Maas, is a working Mum running her own fraud investigation company, Tail ’Em And Nail ’Em (formerly Tail ’Em and Nail ’Em and Jail ’Em, but that was judged too presumptuous). Something of a Rachel Weisz lookalike, Jewish Maxine’s family consists of her opera-loving parents Ernie and Elaine, her two sons in elementary school Ziggy and Otis, her estranged sister Brooke and her ex-Mossad husband Avi, and last but not least her on-again-off-again, not-as-ex-as-he-might-be-ex-husband Horst, a stolid but solid Midwesterner. A ‘big alexithymic lug’ according to best friend Heidi, a career academic with tenure at City College’s Pop Culture Department, with whom Maxine has a Mary Tyler Moore and Rhoda double act relationship (analogy mine): ‘At some point early in their relationship, which has been forever, Maxine understood that she was not the Princess here. Heidi wasn’t either, of course, but Heidi didn’t know that, in fact she thought she was the Princess and furthermore has come over the years to believe that Maxine is the Princess’s slightly less attractive wacky sidekick.’ But, hey, Rhoda got her own show, eventually.
  As with every Pynchon novel, long or short, there is a compendious cast of characters. A few among the many here are: Gabriel Ice, CEO of hashslingrz, a computer security firm which may be funneling money to Saudi Arabia; his wife Tallis, who is also daughter to Maxine’s anarchist friend March Kelleher; ruthless neoliberal enforcer Nick Windlust, with whom Maxine has a guilty fling; Xiomara, Nick’s Guatemalan ex-‘child bride’ – the two women’s relationships with Windlust echo that of Frenesi Gates with Brock Vond in Vineland, the recurring Pynchon motif of hippie/liberal/lefty chicks secretly attracted to (not so) clean-cut fascistic guys; and let’s not forget Maxine’s Buddhist ‘emotherapist’, Shawn: ‘Beaming at her with that vacant, perhaps only Californian, the-Universe-is-a-joke-but-you-don’t-get-it smile which so often drives her to un-Buddhist daydreams seething with rage. Maxine doesn’t want to say “airhead” exactly, though she guesses if somebody put a tire gauge in his ear it might read a couple psi below spec.’ Which begs the question: why does she attend him? Then there’s Conkling Speedwell, a professional ‘nose’ obsessed with Hitler’s aftershave (4711, fyi), born with an enhanced, canine-level sense of smell – redolent of The Crying Of Lot 49’s Dr. Hilarius, who could make a face that rendered people insane. Oh, and Lester Traipse is the embezzling programmer who gets murdered.
  Lots of these characters interact through chance Woody Allen-style Manhattan street-meets, and the book is, among many other things, an askance love letter to New York, where by all accounts Pynchon now resides (and, by extension, Long Island, Pynchon’s birth place). There’s a nostalgic ode to sleazy old Times Square, before it was Disneyfied by Mayor Gulliani, a philistine suburbanite. Amid the mayhem of documentary film makers, nefarious computer programmers and hackers, Russian oligarchs and mobsters, the pining for the heady days of the tech bubble – when you could be at a start-up party every night of the week, and several on Thursdays – there is the ongoing critique of ‘late capitalism as a pyramid racket on a global scale.’
  While there is a palpable and amazing sense of just how much cyberspace has moved on in the short time since the turn of the century, when most of the online conveniences we take for granted today had not even been invented, one thing that hasn’t changed is that the now 76-year-old Pynchon’s attitude to sex remains resolutely casual and adolescent. There is, of course, a school of thought which argues that sex should be causal (if not always adolescent), but it can be difficult to credit that some of the female characters here, Maxine included, let themselves get into the situations in which they find themselves.
  As ever, conspiracy is Pynchon’s major theme, and here we have a Deepweb, accessible only to code breakers, while the rest of us swim in the shallows of the surface web; and also the notion that certain right wing elements had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: ‘Is this all yet another exercise in freaking out the common folk so we’ll keep bleating and begging for protection? How scared is Maxine supposed to feel?’ Yet it all feels more vague and amorphous this time around, which paradoxically only adds to the foreboding and dread, and is also more reflective of the times we live in. If you pitch conspiracy theories of history, at one end of the scale, versus blind chance at the other, in many ways conspiracy is more comforting. At least it means someone’s in charge, the hidden hand is just not whose we thought it was, or whose we’d like it to be. But what if no one is actually calling the shots, and it’s all just one big cosmic gamble and free-for-all? Scary.
  So, we’re not getting another Mason & Dixon or Against The Day blockbuster here, and certainly not something as era-defining as Gravity’s Rainbow. A bit like Vineland, and even Inherent Vice, this is the kind of thing Pynchon can do in his sleep. But it’s still better than what most writers who are wide-awake can dream up. In its own (relatively modest) way, it sums up a historical period of great turbulence and uncertainty just as much as the now canonical works of this great American novelist once did.

This review will appear in due course in the Irish Sunday Independent, doubtless in a much truncated version.

MGMT at The Olympia, October 19, 2013

MGMT at The Olympia last night. Very cool CGI light show. Music wasn't bad either.









Friday, 18 October 2013

Eamon Dunphy is a clown


Since it seems everyone is writing Open Letters these days, here’s mine. It’s to Eamon Dunphy.

Eamon, last Tuesday, post Ireland’s victory over Kazakhstan, you called interim Irish manager Noel King a ‘bully’, and ‘immature, out of his depth, and a little bit unpleasant’, after his behavior in interview with reporter Tony O’Donoghue. You further stated that Noel King ‘attacked’ Tony O’Donoghue. When RTE panel presenter Darragh Maloney suggested that King had received ‘some fairly harsh criticism himself’, you sought to draw a distinction between the professional and private, becoming most barrister-like with Maloney in the process. It was ok for the panel to call King ‘tactically inept’, but not ok for King to respond by calling the panel ‘a comedy show’. ‘Tactically inept’ is professional, apparently, while ‘a comedy show’ is personal.

Eamon, earlier this year you publically, on RTE’s now-defunct Premiership Soccer Saturday, referred to former Manchester City Manager Roberto Mancini as ‘a clown’. Did you mean he is a professional clown, or a clown in his private life? If, giving you the benefit of the doubt, you really meant that Mancini is ‘tactically inept’, i.e. a professional clown, perhaps you can countenance that when Noel King called the RTE panel ‘a comedy show’, he was intimating that he perceives your punditry to be of a poor standard, and not to be taken seriously, rather than suggesting you are dimwitted in your personal life. How inept is Roberto Mancini in his personal life? You see, it’s a fine line, isn’t it Eamon, this professional/private divide?

Since we are being forensic about our arguments, you claim Noel King attacked Tony O’Donoghue because, according to you, King said: ‘You gotta do your homework, you don’t know what you’re talking about’ to O’Donoghue. Incorrect. If you take the trouble to listen back to the interview, King actually said: ‘…if anyone wants to do their homework.’
Furthermore, when you put Darragh Maloney on the spot, you claimed that when Maloney said that King had taken ‘some fairly harsh criticism himself’, implicit in that question/statement was that it was personal criticism of King. That was not ‘implicit’ at all, and Maloney should have defended himself in that regard. Leastways, no more personal than King’s criticism of the panel.

You see, you are criticising King professionally, just as he is criticising you professionally, whether the terminology is ‘tactically inept’, ‘comedy’ or clown’. Otherwise, all hell will just break loose into vulgar name-calling. Or, could it be that you really do have a personal grudge against King, against Mancini, and against Manchester City Football Club? How big a clown is Roberto Mancini in his personal life? How big a comedy show are you in yours?
Or maybe you’re just a professional, and maybe even personal, hypocrite.

Make up your own minds, folks:

http://www.independent.ie/sport/soccer/eamon-dunphy-noel-kings-behaviour-last-night-was-stupid-29665320.html

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Muscle Shoals Documentary

Just come from the press show of Greg 'Freddy' Camalier's documentary about Muscle Shoals' FAME Studios and Sound Studio. Essential viewing for anyone interested in some of the best R'n'B, Soul and Rock music of the past 50+ years (and this despite the presence of Bono - who never actually recorded there anyway). Yo, The Swampers...


Friday, 11 October 2013

Dr. Sean Millar at The Odessa Club

Great intimate gig by Dr. Sean Millar and band at The Odessa Club last night. Wonderful to hear so many of the old songs mixed with the new ones from C48, in a room like that.



Monday, 7 October 2013

A Girl Is A Half-formed Thing by Eimear McBride


A Girl Is A Half-formed Thing


By Eimear McBride

(Galley Beggar Press, £11.00 stg)

This debut novel by Liverpool born, west of Ireland raised, Norwich resident McBride, has been garlanded with glowing reviews in the London Review of Books and the Times Literary Supplement. These notices tended to emphasise the book’s originality and experimentalism. However, what inventiveness or exploration there is resides in an obtuse use of language and idiosyncratic punctuation, which disdains the preposition, enjoys scrambled syntax, and fairly eschews the common comma (although I did spot a total of two in the course of the 203 pages). Beneath this enigmatic playfulness, the subject matter and narrative trajectory remain tediously conventional.
   The story, told in the first person singular and addressed to the second person singular, concerns an unnamed female narrator and her unnamed older brother (every character in this novel is unnamed). There are a couple of years between them, and the tale begins when she is two and he is four, ending when our girl is 20. There is a strong bond between them, oscillating from embarrassment to affection. He was born with a brain tumour which was removed, but is considered a ‘thicko’ at school. The reoccurrence of his illness, this time inoperable and so terminal, is the spur for the novel’s dramatic finale.
  It’s perhaps not surprising they are close: their father abandons the household when they are infants, and their tyrannically religious mother beats them, and tries to set them against each other. The brother also ‘plays’ the mother, in having her wait on him hand and foot. While our heroine is away at college (although it is deemed too trivial actually to tell us what she is studying), he stacks shelves in a local supermarket by day, and becomes a lazy, antisocial, nerdy computer gamer by night.
  In typical bildungsroman fashion, the story arc chronologically follows the narrator through school and its social jostling, adolescent rebellion and loss of virginity, that departure from messed up home to college and undergraduate shenanigans, a rejection of her mother’s fierce brand of evangelical religion, the temporary relief of sexual promiscuity (‘Saying yes the best of powers’ – presumably when boys expect you to say ‘no’), all culminating in a return to the family homestead for her brother’s last days and death. Along the way she is seduced by a visiting uncle from England when aged 13 and has an intermittent affair with him, and seeks out increasingly violent sexual encounters with strangers. She likes being beaten up.
  There is long and complex history of Irish writers making good in England by presenting versions of the Irish experience which merely cater to and reinforce English perceptions and prejudices of Irish stereotypes. When Joyce saw what happened to Wilde in London, it made him only more determined to flee Ireland to continental Europe, and strengthened his refusal to ‘play court jester to the English.’ In our own day, there is still no shortage of Irish writers queuing up to tell the Brits what they want to hear, in publications such as the London Review of Books, conscious no doubt of the worldwide publicity and distribution attendant on a lucrative London publishing deal. In falling over themselves to demonstrate how ‘over’ the postcolonial chip on the shoulder they are, they serve only to show how much it still weighs them down.
  One wonders where Eimear McBride situates herself in this scenario. Although, like everything else, the setting and timeline are frustratingly vague, passing references to Walkmen and Dexy’s Midnight Runners’ song ‘Come On Eileen’ signal we are in the ’80s, that not so fondly remembered time of referenda civil wars. True, the death last year of Savita Halappanavar in a Galway hospital, because ‘this is a Catholic country’, proved Catholicism can still kill; while the subsequent debate around the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill, with rosary sayers scattering holy water on unbelievers outside Dail Eireann, reminded us that these people never learn and the crazies haven’t gone away. But, as even church goers themselves would admit, Catholicism, extreme or otherwise, has become an increasingly peripheral part of contemporary Irish life. So why is a youngish writer like McBride writing about the past? It’s not exactly like Catholic totalitarianism isn’t a well covered topic in Irish literature. Could it be that she thinks this kind of account of Ireland still sits well with certain readers across the water?
  Lots of fundamentalist religion; lots of rough sex: unlike most ‘experimental’ fiction, it should sell well.

Also available here, with reference to Savita Halappanavar excised: